The balance between alkalinity generation by carbonate and silicate weathering and sulfuric acid generation by sulfide weathering controls the effect of weathering on atmospheric pCO2 over geologic timescales. How this balance varies across environmental gradients remains poorly constrained. In this study, we analyze this balance across an erosional gradient of two orders of magnitude in the Three Rivers (Yangtze River, Mekong River, and Salween River) Headwater Region (TRHR), eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). By employing major element chemistry and multiple isotopes (δ34SSO4, δ18OSO4, and δ18OH2O) coupled with forward and inverse approaches, we unmix contributions of silicates, carbonates, evaporites, and sulfides to the total weathering budget. Across the TRHR, riverine SO42– is derived mainly from a mixture of an evaporite source with uniform values of δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4, and a sulfide source that contributes highly variable values of δ34S (-12.2‰ to 4.1‰) and δ18O (-17.7‰ to -1.6‰). Contributions of sulfide oxidation to riverine SO42– vary from 16% to 94%, and sulfuric acid consumes 6% to 63% of the alkalinity produced by weathering. The fractions of weathering alkalinity derived from carbonate weathering range from 36% to 98% relative to silicate weathering. The combination of silicate, carbonate, and sulfide weathering suggests that the instantaneous weathering fluxes of most sampled catchments in the TRHR act as a sink of atmospheric CO2 over timescales shorter than marine carbonate burial (~104 years), but as a carbon source over timescales longer than carbonate burial and shorter than sulfide burial (~107 years). The spatial variability of the balance between alkalinity and acid generation, and, thus, the relationship between chemical weathering and atmospheric pCO2, are largely dependent on lithology. However, within comparable lithologic settings, sulfide and carbonate weathering rates rise with increasing erosion, whereas silicate weathering rates remain constant. Consequently, plateau weathering shifts from a sink to a source of atmospheric CO2 with increasing erosion. These findings suggest that sulfide weathering is more sensitive to erosion than carbonate and silicate weathering, and that it could play an important role in the long-term carbon cycle during mountain building.
Fig. 1 The relationships of ∆ALK/∆DIC (2 × (1 − Z)/R) with catchment-averaged steepness index ksn (a), soil erosion rate in 2019 (GloSEM) (b), precipitation in August (c), and permafrost probability (d).
Citation: Xu, S., Bufe, A., Li, S.-L.*, Erlanger, E.D., Ran, L., Zhong, J., Yang, C.-J., Zhang, L., Ma, T., Sachse, D., 2024. Erosional modulation of the balance between alkalinity and acid generation from rock weathering. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta. 368, 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2023.11.010.
